BlackBalled! (A Bedroom Tale)

It’s a fact: Excessive presence of a vibrating device in your bedroom, night after night, can damage your relationship. Yet some two-thirds of us (90 percent of those young, energetic types between ages 19 and 29) share our bedrooms with such a toy. You may find, to save the relationship, the offending object needs to be banished to some far-flung location Windows 7 Key, where its beady presence cannot intrude on your most intimate hours.

I’m talking, of course, about your BlackBerry, or any other flavor of smartphone you keep at the bedside, lurking between the sheets, or hidden guiltily under a book. Our devices have come to dominate our waking hours. While life may have been easier when apple and blackberry were just fruits of the forest, it’s now incumbent upon us to prevent them also becoming the rotten fruits of Morpheus. Here’s what happened to me.

I confess to packing both BlackBerry and iPhone. I’m not proud of this, merely a necessity. (It’s hard to type secretly under the table at meetings without the tactile feedback of a BB keyboard… and then there’s the ever-free Messenger, friend to the thrifty Scot within me. But, on the other hand, how do I use apps like Instagram and Angry Birds on a BlackBerry?) I try not to take them out of my pocket together and look like a show off (or a thief). I did this inadvertently the other day and was accused by a friend of being telephonically polyamorous. Surely just biPhone-curious?

People will go to the ends of the earth to connect. Literally. Fortunately, most of the ramifications of the tech-enabled exponential increases in this regard are good for the individual and society: more socializing, more awareness, deomcratization. But there is also a dark side: Most manifest in the constant sense of accessibility — and loss of focus, inner peace, tranquility.

For instance, I’ve realized I now get a sudden sense of heightened relaxation the moment a plane takes off. It’s the only good thing about flying, which I’d like ideally to avoid altogether, and started only in the past few years. A sense of calm transcends flight-fear or the most anarchic circumstances (a row of screaming babies, a European school trip flinging BA’s best leek and potato mash at one another with bendy plastic forks, before boisterously photographing the mayhem on smartphones clutched in muddied paws). The reason?

Once I power down after one too many warning looks from the inflight team — sheepishly, with as many mixed feelings as a recovering heroin addict setting down the needle (and in notable company, following Alec Baldwin’s recent expulsion from a flight following a refusal to switch off), everything changes.

The realization that I can’t send emails comes like an enlightenment. I can’t receive incoming ones, with news good, bad or “actionable.” I will even get a certain stay of execution before senders of emails will conclude that I’m being rude, or worse, inefficient, after no reply within the hour. This latter concession is only granted of course so long as they know I was literally beyond the reach of radio waves wedged into a 600-miles-an-hour aluminium sausage 12 miles up.

After a brief, panicky moment wondering how to occupy oneself with no device to hand, I look around, then spot a device with the original flexible battery-less touch screens — known in the old days as pages — and dive into the Daily Mail (in case my mother’s reading this in horror, I did also read the FT as an IQ-offset). I was struck to find — on one page — two bizarre and grave stories of smartphone-induced distraction having afflicted the most respected professionals, to add to countless cases of dangerous driving caused by messaging. In the first story, the pilot of an Australian airliner approaching Singapore was so distracted by a text that he didn’t perform the necessary checks — the co-pilot luckily realized the wheels weren’t down, only 700 feet up. The landing was aborted and no one was hurt this time, though an investigation’s underway. In the second, a family doctor was allegedly so distracted checking emails in consultations that he gave two elderly patients 10 times the morphine dose.

If these professionals, knowing full well the need of 100 percent focus, can be so distracted, what hope is there for the rest of us? Sherry Turkle of MIT, in her excellent recent TED talk on technology and risks of de-humanization, confided that many people now tell her about the important new skill they’re learning Windows 7 Key, of being able to text while holding eye contact with the person in front of them: “hard apparently, but not impossible.” Device obsession is frequently described as full-blown addiction, since it exhibits most of the symptoms. The attention we give our devices is so doting, we could benefit from applying it to our human relationships. And when devices cause such distraction while we’re awake and alert, imagine what happens when we’re in bed and off-guard.

Holding a thought in mind while falling asleep, one can wake up with it, hours later. There’s presumably some evolutionary benefit in this ability — remembering the suspiciously lion-shaped bush you saw outside the cave at dusk, say, and investigate (preferably with a long stick) in the morning. However, if the thought’s related to work, and stressful, it can cause havoc careering round one’s head, bumping into dreams and reflections, like the bull in the proverbial china shop.

This is what I was doing, night after night. It’s an easy excuse to make, “I need a BlackBerry on the bedside table — well, I don’t have an alarm clock! No, of course I don’t have time to go and buy one, I’m way too busy… emailing.” Hmm. The real reason is to get in that last-minute inbox check at the 11th hour (or more like 2 a.m., once I’ve finished performing post-mortems on “essential” mail). By the time I’d drifted off I’d inevitably missed the chance to hug my girlfriend as she fell asleep, having traded that for squinting fanatically at a tiny screen with its unnatural, circadian rhythm-disrupting glow.

It’s been shown in a recent study on more than 4,000 young adults in BMC Public Health that in prospective analysis, overuse of smartphones was associated with stress and sleep disturbances for women, and feelings of “high accessibility” relating to communications devices was associated with stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression for both men and women.

My overuse in the bedroom started to impact my relationship with my girlfriend. As the blinking red beacon continued to bid me goodnight and welcomed me good morning, we argued more. It came to a head one day when (it sounds crazy) I dreamt I thought I’d cheated on her — not with a particular person Windows 7 Activation Key, but hazy memories of the BlackBerry itself. Whether it represented a conduit to actual dreamed infidelity or was personified in its own right, I couldn’t tell. Either way, it was enough. As if I’d had a mistress hidden too long in the wardrobe, I knew it was time to change. So like solving any challenge (well, as soon as I realized I wouldn’t have the resolve to fix it outright), I decided to approach it step by step. The first move was BlackBerry banishment at weekends. Then in the week. After a period of withdrawal I made (debatable) headway by switching to iPhone only.

Not revolutionary, you may well say. Headway though: Firstly, it doesn’t have a seductive-but-treacherous red light. Second, it has apps to wake when my sleep pattern says it’s time. But most importantly, my iPhone doesn’t have work email; it’s my social phone for friends and family only. A device representing downtime and fun is infinitely less problematic than one representing deal flow and HR. (Though one may have worries about the voyeuristic presence of a phone with AI capability in the room… a friend who’d exhausted iPhone’s Siri’s knowledge on factual subject matter, joked that at last he’d sought to get an answer as to how good he was in bed. Housed at the bedside, Siri at last may know!)

As for me, I’m moving back in time toward an alarm clock with which to share my bedroom. Hopefully a true single-function and woefully non-smart one, possibly made of wood and without so much as a screen or a sim card. Imagine.

For more by Dr. Charles Roberts, click here.

For more on unplugging and recharging, click here.

 

Family, Party of 2

For spring break, I took my 7-year-old son to Disney World. As far as I am concerned, it’s a right of passage for any child. I always loved Disney World as a kid, and I knew he would too.

I was surprised at how many parents would “tsk” at me, as though Disney were the devil.
“Ugh. I’d never do Disney unless my children insisted,” they would say with their noses in the air, as if their children were asking for an afternoon in a shantytown. A shantytown filled with princesses and pirates… and general happiness. It’s the most magical place on earth for Christ sake. Why the haters?

From the second we got off the plane, I was amazed by Disney’s ability to make the vacation seem seamless and special, as though they were waiting specifically for us.

When we arrived at the hotel, I stood with my son, luggage in hand (or on the ground — it’s amazing how much a bag can weigh when packed for two people) and tipped the man who had carried it to the door for me.

“Thank you!” He said and then looked perplexed. “It’s just the two of you?”

“Yes.” I replied.

“Are you meeting your family here?”

We are a family, I wanted to say. But I just said “No. “

I imagined a Disney phone chain of sorts beginning as we entered the hotel. “Mother and child approaching. Do not ask where the rest of the family is. No. There is none. No. Shhh. Here she comes. She is walking towards you.”

I suddenly felt like a 16-year-old who gave birth to my son in a high school locker room. Was this 1969? For all the diversity on the “It’s A Small World” ride, they certainly weren’t up to date on the modern family. I would like to see some men puppets on that ride — one white and one Indian — kissing. And holding their black baby in Bjorn as the music plays on, “There’s so much that we share and it’s time your aware, it’s a small world after all.”

After a full morning in the park replica watches, I realized an incomplete family was a rarity in the Magic Kingdom. People all around us, including families we talked to in line would ask, “Is it just the two of you?”

I started taking advantage of the pity that followed. “Would you like us to take a picture of you two?” “Sure”, I’d say, putting my arm around my son, both of us flashing our biggest smiles. It’s as though we had our own private photographer wherever we went.

“What great pictures of you guys replica watches! How did you get so many pictures of the two of you?” A friend asked upon our return. “Oh, we had the greatest photographer. Yes. Her name was pity.”

But wait replica watches! It got better. One very cute ride operator in his twenties was making small talk with us when we asked for directions outside the exit of my son’s favorite ride. He kept referring to me as my son’s sister. He was good. Was he flirting?

“Are you having a good time?” he asked, with some kind of southern accent that I definitely have a liking for.

“We are having a great time.” I said.

“I am about to make it even better.” With that, he opened up the exit and told us we could cut the entire 50-minute line. My son and I looked at each other and squealed with delight. The greatest thing about hanging out with my son at this age is that he gets it. He understood how cool this privilege was. We skipped up to the front and rode the ride without a care in the world. As we exited we thanked him.

“Wait, is it just the two of you?” he asked.

“Yep,” I smiled.

“You are too pretty to be alone,” he said. Then he bent down to my son’s level, “You are lucky I think your sister is so pretty. I am going to let you cut the line again.”

“Really??” we said in unison. Our eyes wide. We rode the ride again and again. Never once waiting in that long line.

On the ride my son turned to me. “He said you were pretty.”

“Is that funny?”

“Yes.”

The perks continued on through the rest of the week. From letting us enter the Indiana Jones stunt show 5 minutes after it started…

“Is it just the two of you?”

To random park employees offering up their fast passes.

“If it’s just the two of you, you can have these.”

In the end we had a great, magical trip, just as Disney had promised. And guess what? We shared it as a family. Just the two of us.

 

La Nueva Revolución Educativa

Su complexión pequeña contrasta con los grandes aretes que Claudia Gómez suele lucir. Aunque no son tan grandes como su sueño de tener un futuro mejor.

Las aspiraciones de esta joven latina no siempre fueron grandes y brillantes. Cuando cursaba el octavo grado fue expulsada de la escuela secundaria a la que asistía tras una disputa con otra estudiante. Claudia era la alumna más destacada de su clase.

Una y otra vez, la historia se repetiría. Claudia fue suspendida de varias escuelas de su comunidad porque llegaba tarde o iniciaba discusiones con otros estudiantes que solían burlarse de ella.

Finalmente, su retraso escolar fue de tal nivel que prefirió abandonar la escuela. A lo largo de esos años de castigos y medidas disciplinarias nadie supo reparar su corazón roto. A los 12 años Claudia presenció con horror como su hermana era asesinada de un disparo. Otra de sus hermanas también resultó herida en ese incidente trágico.

“Durante todo ese tiempo en que estuve lidiando con problemas ocasionados por mi comportamiento violento y los aprietos para conseguir transporte, nunca me preguntaron si podían hacer algo para ayudarme,” recuerda Claudia. Video:

Las heridas de ese pasado la hicieron fuerte y hoy no sólo comparte su historia con todos aquellos que deseen acucharla, sino que está en camino de terminar la preparatoria y se ha convertido en una activa organizadora de La Coalición de Justicia Juvenil donde lucha por cambiar el sistema que en el pasado la ignoró y nunca hizo nada por entender las heridas detrás de su enojo.

La historia de Claudia muestra una falla importante del sistema educativo en el que están nuestros niños: disciplina escolar excesiva. Desde hace mucho tiempo, los políticos han empujado un enfoque simplista Tattoo Machine Suppliers, “el amor duro” un sistema escolar disciplinario que enfatiza suspensiones y expulsiones. Los números son alarmantes. Sólo en California, más de 400,000 estudiantes fueron suspendidos durante el ciclo escolar 2009-2010. La cifra equivale a decenas de millones de horas de clases perdidas para los jóvenes de nuestra nación.

Cabe destacar que las infracciones que condujeron a estas acciones disciplinarias, no fueron tan graves como la mayoría podría imaginar. Datos de un estudio nacional reciente encontró que más de 43% de suspensiones disciplinarias fueron por “insubordinación” (ej. Contestar con un “desafío deliberado”, etc.) y menos del 1% se debieron a situaciones serias como posesión o uso de armas de fuego.

Como puede imaginarse, las repercusiones educativas para estos estudiantes son enormes. Las estadísticas muestran que aquellos alumnos que fueron suspendidos al menos una vez, tienen tres veces más probabilidades de abandonar la escuela. Y la correlación entre las expulsiones y la participación en el sistema de justicia juvenil es directa e irrevertible.

Otro aspecto preocupante de esta política disciplinaria es la relación desproporcionada en la que se recurre a la suspensión del alumno entre los diferentes grupos étnicos. Los estudiantes Latinos tienen más probabilidades de ser suspendidos que los blancos. En el caso de los alumnos con discapacidades la probabilidad de que se les somata a una forma superior de castigo se duplica. Estas grandes diferencias persisten incluso cuando los investigadores comparan a estudiantes que presentan antecedentes de comportamientos similares.

A pesar de toda la retórica, los resultados de las investigaciones son claras. Someter a los niños a través de duras políticas disciplinarias en las escuelas simplemente no mejora el desempeño educativo – individualmente o para la escuela en conjunto. Ningún estudio ha podido demostrar que estas políticas impositivas proporcionan algún beneficio pedagógico significativo.

Afortunadamente, la marea se está revirtiendo. Educadores, padres, políticos y estudiantes como Claudia están abogando enérgicamente para que se implemente un enfoque diferente.

Algunos de los cambios van a suceder a través de las acciones en los niveles más altos. Este año, el Secretario de Educación, Arne Duncan, dijo a los medios de comunicación que: “la triste realidad es que los estudiantes de minoría étnicas en toda América enfrentan medidas disciplinarias más severas que aquellos que no lo son, incluso dentro de una misma escuela.”

En California, los legisladores están en la búsqueda de soluciones de sentido común para aquellas escuelas que año tras año suspenden más del 25% de su alumnado, y los desafía a que reduzcan sus cifras. Otro proyecto de ley busca cambiar la definición de “desafío deliberado,” que puede conducir a un estudiante a ser suspendido por cualquier situación ya sea que no entregue su tarea Tattoo Guns, no preste atención Good Tattoo Ink, o se niegue a seguir instrucciones como quitarse un abrigo, un sombrero o no desee prestar juramento en clase. Si desea conocer más sobre el tema, puede ingresar a la página web www.MejorandolaDisciplina.org o www.FixSchoolDiscipline.org.

Pero el cambio se dará de forma paulatina: Una escuela a la vez, un profesor a la vez y un estudiante a la vez. Hay una revolución silenciosa emergiendo alrededor de la disciplina escolar. Es una revolución de padres de familia que buscan tener una voz activa sobre lo que está ocurriendo en las escuelas de sus hijos. Es una revolución de profesores que buscan pasar de dirigir simplemente un salón de clase a buscar apoyo profesional para ayudar a que todos los estudiantes tengan éxito. Es una revolución comunitaria que está movilizando activistas sociales, jueces y autoridades de la ley a una conversación abierta. Es una revolución de estudiante dispuestos a asumir la responsabilidad de analizar su comportamiento y trabajar para cambiarlo.

Como dijo Claudia, quedar suspendido es sinónimo de “días sin acceso a la educación.” Así es cómo todos percibimos este problema.

Hernán Vera es abogado y actual presidente de Public Counsel, la organización de asistencia legal pro bono mas grande de los Estados Unidos. www.publiccounsel.org

 

De Mitterrand à Hollande d’un pari à l’autre

J’avais onze ans lors de ce moment de complicité avec mon père, le mineur immigré de Oignies dans le Pas-de-Calais, d’ordinaire si sévère et impassible. J’avais onze ans le jour où je m’osai à le défier, en lui lançant le pari que son rêve se réaliserait, un rêve auquel il refusait de croire mais dont j’étais persuadé de la vraisemblance et de la concrétisation. J’avais onze ans quand je reçus de ses mains minées par le charbon mais revivifiées par les circonstances les dix francs du gain de ce fameux pari.

C’était le 10 mai 1981, j’avais onze ans lorsque François Mitterrand, symbole éternel du parti socialiste et de la gauche, fut élu président de la République par le peuple français.

J’en ai quarante deux aujourd’hui, soit l’âge de mon père à l’époque, et je conserve intact ce souvenir en mémoire. Plus que l’origine de mes convictions et de ma conscience politique, une véritable révélation; le point de départ d’un dévouement et d’un engagement absolu dans les pas des grands hommes qui ont marqué l’histoire sociale et solidaire de mon pays. J’ai quarante deux ans et après vingt cinq années de militantisme fervent et passionné, ponctuées de moments de joie et de désillusions, de victoires et de défaites, d’espoir et de doutes, de travail acharné dans tous les cas; je ressens depuis un peu plus d’une année une force sereine et confiante monter en puissance, une force au potentiel phénoménal capable de rassembler tout sur son passage pour soulever des montagnes. Une force humble et tranquille, soumise à son destin, celui de servir les intérêts de notre pays. Cette force a un nom, elle a un visage aussi, elle s’appelle François Hollande et je n’avais plus ressenti de telle conviction ni un tel engouement depuis trop longtemps.

Ce souffle nouveau incarné par l’émergence de François Hollande au plus haut niveau de responsabilité qui soit, à savoir sa candidature à la fonction suprême de chef de l’Etat, ne prendra tout sons sens que lors de sa consécration le 6 mai prochain. Les raisons d’exulter de son aura et de sa présence sont innombrables mais si pertinentes que je me dois d’en partager l’essence avec vous.
Au-delà de la nécessité capitale, vitale et urgente de rompre avec la politique désavouée menée depuis cinq ans, basée sur le mensonge Tattoo Ink And Supplies, la stigmatisation et l’humiliation: des chômeurs, qui seraient tous fainéants; des citoyens d’origine étrangère, terroristes en puissance; des immigrés, venus voler notre pain; des jeunes, sans valeur; des vieux, qui ne pensent qu’à leur retraite ou encore des fonctionnaires, incapables de se satisfaire de la peau de chagrin taillée sur mesure par l’actuel gouvernement et sa philosophie.

Face à ces ignominies, mieux qu’une alternative, l’opportunité d’écrire l’histoire et de rendre à la France sa splendeur perdue. François Hollande, un être vrai, simple, compétent; un être juste et sage. Un homme qui incarne le redressement de la France dans la tradition de ses vertus et l’authenticité de ses valeurs. Un homme qui fait de la fraternité une priorité Tools Tattoo, qui accorde une importance sans égal à la jeunesse, nos nouvelles générations à qui l’on se doit de redonner espoir Best Tattoo Machine, sans quoi comment pourraient-elles avoir encore confiance en notre République?

Nous vivons dans un monde où la fin (et même la faim) des uns fait le profit des autres. En ces temps de crise acerbe et de précarité contagieuse, nous avons plus que jamais besoin d’un président incarnant la solidarité et l’altruisme, leader d’une nation de laquelle chacun de ses citoyens doit pouvoir s’identifier, s’unir à l’ensemble de ses compatriotes par un fil conducteur qui n’altèrerait en rien ni leur intégrité ni leur identité. Un pays qui se doit de véhiculer une image positive au reste du monde, un vivier de sagesse, de connaissance et une main tendue, un allié en cas de difficulté. Un tel projet, une telle France ne peut se réaliser sans une justice intransigeante et inflexible. François Hollande l’a bien compris, lui qui souhaite un redressement implacable de notre système judiciaire, système dont l’avocat que je suis constate au quotidien les carences et les difficultés et qui a tant besoin de vraies réformes.

Mes chers concitoyens, l’heure n’est pas à la fatalité mais à l’espérance, portés par l’enthousiasme de l’avènement d’un homme d’exception dans la lignée des grands Jean Jaurès ou François Mitterrand: François Hollande. Il nous donne rendez-vous le 6 mai, pour une démonstration de force, pour la victoire du renouveau. Si mon vieux père demeure prudent et persiste dans ses craintes d’un monde toujours plus dur et toujours moins humain, moi j’y crois. Dur comme fer.
J’ai même parié un euro (symbolique) avec lui en faveur de ce changement salvateur. Qui me suit dans ce pari?

LIRE AUSSI:

>> Tous les articles sur le second tour de la présidentielle
>> Le second tour de l’élection présidentielle 2012 en direct
>> Sarkozy et Hollande : deux visions de la société
>> Politiques et anciens candidats votent
>> François Hollande et Nicolas Sarkozy ont voté
>> La soirée se prépare, de Tulle à la Bastille, de la Mutualité à la Concorde
>>Suivez toutes les dernières infos sur notre fil Twitter avec notre hashtag #HuffPost2012 et sur notre page Facebook

 

Gay Marriage Advocate Says Obama Helps National Co

Richard Socarides, a long-time gay rights advocate and former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton Cheap Hale Bob Dresses, told ABC News that Obama’s public support for same-sex marriages is an “extremely positive” moment that will help coalesce a national consensus.

“The struggle he’s had on this issue and how and why he’s ended up where he has… will be helpful to all Americans who are struggling with this,” Socarides said.  ”I think that the fact that he was thinking about this for awhile – neither yes, nor no – was where many Americans are.”

“While it’s been a frustrating two years for us as advocates, I think we’ll look back on the process and think it was a very worthwhile journey and helpful to getting us to a national consensus,” he said, noting Obama’s preferred strategy has been to let public opinion “percolate up rather than come from the top.”

“I think it’s a style of governing that’s sometimes frustrating, but when it ends in the right place Emilio Pucci Dresses sale, it can be very effective,” he said.

Some gay rights advocates had called on Obama to speak out forcefully against North Carolina’s Amendment 1, which was passed Tuesday and bans all same-sex unions in the state. He opposed the measure in a statement through his re-election campaign, but never addressed it directly.

“The result in North Carolina is disappointing, especially if you live in North Carolina, but where this will end up is not in doubt, both with President Obama and the country at large,” Socarides said. “Given the margins there – had President Obama done this earlier – I don’t think it would have made much of a difference.”

As for the politics of Obama’s evolution – from opposing same-sex marriage on religious grounds in 2004 to embracing it today – Socarides said it wouldn’t affect the president’s standing with members of his base.

“This will not hurt him with anybody in his core base of voters, including African-Americans,” he said. “I strongly doubt there are any African-Americans who are going to vote against him because of this. But it’s basically a 50-50 issue in this country and that means in some places it’s stronger than others. It might impact the calculation in some states. But overall I think it’s going to be a big positive for the president because the president is leading and he’s being authentic and that’s what voters want.”

SHOWS: World News

 

Exclusive Zeus gets down with Honda’s new Insight

Exclusive Zeus Honda Insight — Click above for image gallery Tattoo Supplies

Japanese tuner Exclusive Zeus has done a job on the Honda Insight, so that now you can be green and still be a badass. Part of the company’s GLMRS Line, the kit consists of front and rear spoilers, grille, and side skirts fabricated in aluminum – but you’ll have to take care of the wheels and lowering on your own time. You can buy the pieces individually or get the whole bunch for ¥134,400 ($1,418 U.S.) unpainted, or ¥207,900 ($2,194 U.S.) painted to match your car. We’re not sure about those wheels Tattoo Supplies, but Zeusified Insight definitely has a certain “angry vacuum cleaner” quality going for it.

Related GalleryZeus Honda Insight
[Source: Zeus]

 

Did Warren Burger Create the Health Care Mess

Click here for a guide to following the health care reform story online.

Chief Justice Warren Burger

On May 15, a 25-year-old woman named Hilary Carpenter had an operation at the Colorado Orthopaedic and Surgical Hospital in Denver to replace a shunt valve in her brain. After the surgery, Carpenter experienced a severe headache and nausea. After consulting with a physician on duty, a registered nurse at the hospital administered Demerol, but the dosage was wrong, and Carpenter’s heart stopped. In a scene that state investigators later described as “chaotic,” hospital staff was unable to locate quickly the equipment needed to revive Carpenter. According to the investigators, there were only a few people on hand that day to deal with the crisis, and those present lacked training to handle such emergencies. Eventually the staff did something you wouldn’t normally expect a hospital to do: They called 911. A paramedic team took Carpenter to a different hospital, where she died.

A July 17 news story about this incident in the Denver Post prompted an immediate outcry from Sens. Max Baucus of Montana and Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Democratic chairman and ranking Republican member of the finance committee Replica White Herve leger, then as now struggling to craft a bipartisan health reform bill. The occasion for their outrage was that the Colorado Orthopaedic and Surgical Hospital is one of about 230 hospitals in the United States that are owned by doctors, nearly all of them so-called “specialty hospitals” that steer clear of the seriously ill or uninsured. “Sen. Baucus and I have worked for years now to address the concerns that come with physician-owned hospitals,” Grassley said Cheap DKNY Clothing, “including inherent conflicts of interests for physician-owners and, more importantly, patient safety. I remain concerned about the ability of these facilities to address emergency situations.” The senators have written into their still-incomplete reform bill that any new doctor-owned hospitals will be barred from participating in Medicare and that existing doctor-owned hospitals must increase safety precautions. The House bill (which has finally won support from Blue Dog Democrats with what appear to be minor concessions) contains a similar provision.

Advertisement

Doctor-owned hospitals are the most conspicuous manifestation of a culture of entrepreneurship that’s gone a long way toward creating today’s health care crisis. Although traditional economic theory holds that competition drives prices down Buy BCBG Dresses, in medicine competition had tended to drive prices up as doctors explored new avenues for profit, most typically through fee-for-service overuse of expensive technologies and procedures. It’s easy to shrug at such things and say, “That’s capitalism.” But, in fact, market-driven medicine didn’t exist a generation ago Buy Bandage dresses, because the American Medical Association didn’t allow it. “I saw it happen before my own eyes,” says Dr. Arnold Relman, 86, emeritus professor at Harvard Medical School and former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine. Relman has written extensively (most recently in the New York Review of Books) about what he terms “the medical-industrial complex.” Much of the blame for its creation, Relman believes, lies with the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar.

Goldfarb doesn’t get a lot of attention from the health-reform crowd, partly because (as its name suggests) it was a case involving lawyers, not doctors Missoni Dresses sale, and partly because it extended the reach of antitrust law, something usually favored by the same sort of Democrats who want to make health insurance universal.

Lewis H. Goldfarb was a homebuyer in Fairfax County, Va., who got mad when he couldn’t find a title-search lawyer willing to charge less than 1 percent of the purchase price, the minimum recommended by the county’s bar association and enforced by the state bar. Goldfarb maintained that the bar’s imposition of a minimum fee constituted price fixing and violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. The Supreme Court agreed, and in a unanimous opinion (minus Justice Lewis Powell, who recused himself), Chief Justice Warren Burger concluded that law and other “learned professions” participated in “trade or commerce” as defined by the Sherman Act and therefore could not engage in “anticompetitive conduct.”

Nowhere in the opinion did the words medicine or doctor appear, but the implications for health care were immediately obvious. Prior to Goldfarb, Relman explains, any notion that doctors or hospitals might seek to maximize profits was deemed a violation of professional ethics. AMA guidelines forbade doctors to advertise, to sell drugs, or to own a financial interest in any lab or machinery they used to perform tests. Medical doctors’ sole source of income in the health arena was supposed to be the care of patients (or supervising the care of patients). “For the most part,” Relman says, “those guidelines were followed.”

After Goldfarb Buy DKNY Dresses, the AMA’s lawyers warned that such prohibitions risked being struck down in court as anti-competitive. So the AMA altered its message. Doctors could now have other sources of health care-related income, provided these money-making activities weren’t harmful to patients and that patients knew about them. In 1982, the Supreme Court followed up on Goldfarb by striking down not a minimum fee but a maximum fee imposed by Arizona’s Maricopa County Medical Society. Federal regulations were imposed to ban a few particularly egregious types of physician self-dealing.

SINGLE PAGE Page: 1 | 2

 

Bubble Trouble

Eli Pariser

The first conversation I ever had about the Internet was in 1993 with Robert Wright, who was then a colleague at the  New Republic. This “Net” thing was going to be a big deal, I remember Bob telling me, but it could create a few problems. One was that it was going to empower crazies, since geographically diffuse nut jobs of all sorts would be able to find each other online. Another was that it could hurt democratic culture by encouraging narrow-minded folk to burrow deeper into their holes. Wright spelled out those concerns in an article that stands as a model of prescience and a delightful time-capsule. (“People who ‘post’ on the Net’s many different bulletin boards—its ‘newsgroups’—know that their words can be seen from just about any chunk of inhabited turf on this planet.”)

Eighteen years later, our lingo has evolved, but the worries haven’t changed much. Wright’s first concern, about digital technology empowering terrorists and fanatics, has clearly been borne out. His second, about the Internet fostering mental rabbit warrens, remains an open issue. In his new book, The Filter Bubble, Eli Pariser Christian Audigier Clothes sale, the former director of the liberal activist group Moveon.org, argues that an informational dystopia is finally arriving. Thanks to advances in personalization, we are all getting more of what we like and agree with, and less that challenges our beliefs. Pariser sees these tools undermining civic discourse. “The filter bubble pushes us in the opposite direction,” he writes. “It creates the impression that our narrow self-interest is all that exists.” The loss of an informational commons Buy Karen Millen Dresses, he frets, is making us closed-minded, less intellectually adventurous Discount Christian Audigier Clothes, and more vulnerable to propaganda and manipulation. Pariser’s qualms echo those expressed by Nicholas Negroponte and Cass Sunstein,who have warned about the Web turning into everybody’s narcissistic “Daily Me” feed. 

Advertisement

The dark side to personalization has special relevance to those of us working at the intersection of journalism and technology.  While the Web has provided consumers with a means to individualize their commerce and entertainment choices, it hasn’t, until recently, done so with news per se. But investment is now flowing into just this kind of personalization filter. The Washington Post Co., which owns Slate, recently launched Trove, “a personalized news and information engine,” with which I’ve been peripherally involved. The New York Times Co. has News.me, a subscription-based “personalized news service.” Flipboard and Zite, which create personalized “magazines” for tablets based on your Facebook and Twitter feeds, are new Silicon Valley darlings.

Extrapolating from all this activity, and from expanding efforts to customize search and social media experiences online, it’s now possible to imagine a world in which every person creates his own mental fortress and apprehends the outside world through digital arrow-slits. But is this long-standing theoretical fear becoming an actual problem in our society? Pariser’s favorite factoid, with which he starts his book, is that Google now personalizes search results according to 57 different signals, even if you’re not logged in through a Gmail account. You’d think someone worried about the hazards of personalization would pay more attention to Facebook, but Pariser believes that Google’s 57 varieties include, or amount to, ideological frames

Pariser believes that Google’s 57 varieties include, or amount to Cheap Chanel Dresses, ideological frames. Last year, he says he asked two women friends, who shared liberal political views, to search the term “BP.” One woman saw investment information about the company. The other saw news about the oil spill.  Amazingly, this single anecdote is all he offers by way of support for the central claim of his book.

Doubting the accuracy of Pariser’s assertion, I asked for a few of my Twitter followers and Facebook friends to search four terms that seemed likely to show ideological fragmentation: “John Boehner,” “Barney Frank,”"Ryan Plan,” and “Obamacare.”  My five volunteers were:

Tom, my Republican cousin-in-law who works on Wall Street Jake, who says he’s an independent and works as an insurance consultant in Dubuque, IowaSteven, a moderate Democrat and small business owner in Royal Oak, Mich.Pat, a former Slate developer, who is liberal and lives in Chicago Fred, an old college roommate, who works in transportation and says he’s a “left-of-democrat quasi-socialist”

There were only minor discrepancies in the screen shots they sent back for these queries. The insurance consultant from Dubuque got Wikipedia entries for the two congressmen ahead of their own official websites, while all the others got the official sites first. But none of the minor variations aligned in any apparent way with anyone’s political views. For Boehner, for instance, all of the testers—and I—got the same hostile site as the fifth return.

Google’s response to this, when I asked for comment Herve leger strapless sale, was a statement about the need to balance personal relevance and diversity. “We actually have algorithms in place designed specifically to limit personalization and promote variety in the results page,” a spokesman emailed me. Independent analysts aren’t seeing a problem, either. Jonathan Zittrain, a professor of law and computer science at Harvard, who studies Web censorship, agrees that Google isn’t doing what Pariser says it is. “In my experience, the effects of search personalization have been light,” he told me. It is true Buy DKNY Clothing, of course, that if you consistently click on search results from any news source—whether Fox News or the New York Times—that source will rise in your rankings, just as “liking” something or clicking on items in your Facebook news feed increases the likelihood of more of the same turning up. But in the past 15 years, fears that we’re all feeding at the trough of a “Daily Me” haven’t gotten much closer to reality.

Why haven’t the geniuses of the Web figured out how to personalize news? The answer is that it’s a very tough problem. When it comes to movies or songs, algorithms can compare data about my preferences against a large corpus of material that stays mostly constant from day to day. But news changes constantly. To predict what news I want, an algorithm has to gauge my interest in events that haven’t happened yet. Human editors are still way better than machines at this task, and I’m not betting on Watson to defeat Jill Abramson anytime soon. Better algorithmic personalization may come to supplement human curation, but I seriously doubt it will supplant it.

SINGLE PAGE Page: 1 | 2

 

Canine Commando

Elsewhere in Slate, if dogs of war aren’t your thing, maybe you’d appreciate a brief history of the “cats of war.” John Dickerson looks at Obama’s poll numbers  and Dahlia Lithwick says torture is still stupid and wrong. For the most up-to-date-coverage, visit the  Slatest. Slate’s complete coverage is   here. At Foreign Policy, the man who caught al-Zarqawi explains why water-boarding is not the way to catch bad guys, and Leah Farrall digs deep into how al-Qaida will pick its new chief. Read FP’s complete coverage here.

Two helicopters ferried 79 commandos and one dog into Osama Bin Laden’s compound for Sunday’s successful kill operation. Why did the Pentagon send in a canine with the special forces?

A Navy dog in training

For its sniffer, of course. The special operations forces do have their own canine training program, but it’s very hush-hush. Furthermore Herve Leger v neck sale, neither the Pentagon nor the White House is talking about the role the dog played in Sunday’s operation, and they haven’t even confirmed that a dog was involved at all. (It seems the information first came from the British tabloid the Sun, but has been reported in more reputable papers. Slate’s Jack Shafer advises readers to maintain a healthy skepticism about such reports.) If Navy SEAL T eam Six did indeed bring along a dog Bandage dresses sale, then we might guess at its role based on the Pentagon’s non-confidential Military Working Dog Program. It’s possible that the commandos brought a specialized search dog, which would have been sent in ahead of the humans to find explosives or people hidden inside the building. Or they might have used a “combat tracker” dog instead—one of a newer class of military animals developed by the Marines just a year ago. These are taught to pick up the scent of a particular individual Buy Chloe Dresses, usually from a footprint or a few drops of blood, and then follow the trail. If Bin Laden had heard the choppers coming and fled the scene, a combat tracker dog could have been used to track him down as he high-tailed it through the streets of Abbottabad.

The Pentagon currently employs 2,700 dogs, up from the pre-9/11 litter of 1,800. Most of them were purchased in Europe, where a long tradition of using dogs for police and military purposes has created great breeding lines. Before buying a dog, the Pentagon tests the animal for aggression, fear of gunshots, and inclination to search. The Pentagon also gives each dog a thorough physical examination, including X-rays, to confirm that it’s in top condition. For about a decade Cheap Missoni Dresses, the Department of Defense has been trying to establish its own breeding program, out of concern that our supply of top-quality dogs could be choked off in wartime.

Advertisement

When it’s time to send a military working dog on assignment, a handler shows up at the main kennel at Lackland Air Force Base and completes a training course with two separate animals. The one that works better with that particular handler is sent off with him to a new home, while the runner-up goes back into the singles pool. Then the newly minted duo does some more training together before taking the field. There are entirely separate courses of study for general service patrol dogs Herve Leger sale, specialized search dogs, and combat trackers. Military dogs must take continuing education classes throughout their careers, as their skills tend to erode after about 30 days without practice.

The U.S. military has deployed canines for centuries, but never sent them into combat until about fifty years ago. Military dogs used to be trained for super-aggression. They were used as sentries and guard dogs, and were taught to distrust all humans but the handler. As a result, they couldn’t function as part of a combat team, because they had a habit of biting other members of the unit. Modern war dogs are far more comfortable working with strangers Discount Herve Leger v neck, even those wearing intimidating commando outfits.

Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer.

Explainer thanks Gerry Proctor and Lt. Col. Elizabeth Robbins of the Department of Defense.

 

Nissan releases details aboutAround View Monitor

Spatially-challenged drivers rejoice Replica Chopard Watches! As previously reported Replica IWC Watches, Nissan has developed a new parking assist system that employs four ultra-wide high-resolution cameras mounted in the front Fake Raymond Weil Watches for sale, rear and both sides of the vehicle to provide a bird’s eye view of the vehicle’s surroundings. All those images are processed and displayed in real-time on a dash-mounted screen, giving drivers a 360-degree view of what they don’t want to hit.

Shifting the car into reverse or drive will alternate between a view of the front or rear Buy Cheap Replica Tudor Watches, while drivers will be able to toggle the left Discount Replica Cartier Watches, front and right views when performing a particularly tricky parallel parking maneuver.

The first application of Nissan’s “Around View Monitor” in the U.S. will be in the Infiniti EX35, but we’d expect it to become a hot commodity on some of Nissan and Infiniti’s more bloated SUV offerings soon.

Nissan’s full press release Fake Girard Perregaux Watches, including a video, is posted after the jump.

[Source: Nissan]

Related GalleryNissan’s Around View Monitor